Introduction Treating patients with chronic limb-threating ischemia who have had failed femoropopliteal bypass represents a challenge, because these patients have TASC C or D lesions and may not be good candidates for surgical intervention. Endovascular intervention may offer a suitable solution. Patients and methods A retrospective case series of 34 patients presenting with chronic limb-threating ischemia and previously failed femoropopliteal bypass were subjected to native vessel revascularization through a contralateral approach with balloon dilatation and stenting on demand of the superficial femoral artery. Results Technical success was achieved in 91.18% of cases, stenting was done in 64.51% of cases, and the mean time for the procedure was 73.18±12.96 min. Ankle–brachial index significantly increased with clinical improvement. The patency rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 80, 56.67, and 43.33%, respectively, whereas the limb-salvage rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 96.67, 93.33, and 93.33%, respectively. Conclusion Native vessel revascularization is a feasible procedure that can be done safely with acceptable technical success and limb-salvage rate. It represents a good option for patients who are poor candidates for redo-surgery.
Elmahrouky, A. (2021). Primary patency rate of native vessel revascularization after failed femoropopliteal bypass surgery. The Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 40(4), 1151-1156. doi: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_180_21
MLA
Ahmed Elmahrouky. "Primary patency rate of native vessel revascularization after failed femoropopliteal bypass surgery", The Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 40, 4, 2021, 1151-1156. doi: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_180_21
HARVARD
Elmahrouky, A. (2021). 'Primary patency rate of native vessel revascularization after failed femoropopliteal bypass surgery', The Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 40(4), pp. 1151-1156. doi: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_180_21
VANCOUVER
Elmahrouky, A. Primary patency rate of native vessel revascularization after failed femoropopliteal bypass surgery. The Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 2021; 40(4): 1151-1156. doi: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_180_21